![]() |
| Just how much can you flex in the workplace and still be yourself? |
Category Archives: Emotional Intelligence
There’s wisdom in knowing when to forgive
![]() |
| There’s wisdom in knowing when to forgive |
When it’s time to give feedback to the boss
![]() |
| Giving feedback to the boss? Don’t skirt around what you have to say. |
I have been following a thread of discussion on LinkedIn. The discussion, amongst fellow coaches, was prompted by a request along the following lines: Anyone got any suggestions for building rapport with a CEO whom the Board has asked you to coach, but who believes he’s doing a good job? I have the opportunity to have a couple of interactions with him before the Board lets him know they’d like him to work with a coach. Whilst the coach is at risk of tying himself in knots, most colleagues have encouraged him to establish clear boundaries with the Board. It’s for Board members to give clear and direct feedback to the CEO about the behaviours they find difficult. It’s for Board members to suggest that the CEO work with a coach.
The issue is common. I leave out the word “surprisingly” because why would it surprise us that a human being who’s risen to a senior position may do things we find difficult – unless, of course, we hold the view that organisations only recruit people into roles who are effective and well suited to the role. We’d like this to be true but it isn’t. Instead, we are faced with human beings in the role of the “boss”, people whose behaviours we find difficult. “He tells us he wants us to share our ideas but when we do, he dismisses them out of hand. It’s always his ideas that prevail”. “It’s been five years since I told her that John isn’t performing and he’s still sitting round the top table. Yes, she’s taken work away so he can’t do any damage but she needs to face the issue straight on so we don’t have to work around him any more”. “I’d like to actually have a boss – someone who is aware of what I do and who is able to give direction and support. Yes, I am pretty self motivated when it comes to it and still, I’d like to know how my work is seen in this organisation”. To these issues, I am sure you can add your own – because bosses rarely measure up and give us the support and direction we need, even though it’s in their job description to do so.
And it’s hard to give feedback. It’s hard because we find ourselves chafing against our expectation – of which we may or may not be aware – that it’s for the boss to know how to manage us. How come we are doing the work of managing our staff and we have to manage the boss as well?! It’s hard because the very reason the feedback is needed is because the boss has a blind spot and he or she does not enjoy hearing about behaviours of which s/he’s unaware. It’s hard because, at the end of the day, the boss is the boss – there is an inbuilt difference in the power he or she wields in the organisation. So we fear our boss’s response to any feedback we might give. Most of all it’s hard because to share our needs fully can leave us feeling vulnerable and exposed. More vulnerable and exposed than we like to admit.
There are ways around this. You can try to outsource the giving of feedback like the Board I mentioned right at the top of the page. You can talk about your boss to others – to your colleagues or your loved ones – declaring heatedly that he or she ought to know better. Hey! You can even change jobs in the hope of finding a better boss next time. These strategies protect you from the vulnerability of giving feedback. Some of them leave you with the same boss and the same behaviours and the same unmet needs. One of them may even leave you with a different boss and different behaviours and different unmet needs.
Some people even protect themselves from the vulnerability that can come from giving feedback by showering their boss with “shoulds” and “oughts” and even “good ideas”. “Don’t you think it would be a good idea if we checked in every few weeks to make sure we know we’re on track?” “I thought you might enjoy this article – it says that effective leaders should hold regular meetings with their teams”. Even when the “should” is not explicit, holding the view that our boss “should” (take time for one to one meetings, understand your need for clarity, lead more effective team meetings…) in some way protects us, placing the responsibility for change with the boss.
At the same time, if you want things to change, the ball is in your court. It’s time for self-examination: do you want this change enough that you’re willing to speak up or is this one you want to let go? And if you choose to speak up, it helps to be clear. Let your boss know what it is he or she does that doesn’t work for you and what behaviours you’d like instead. Be willing to share how these different behaviours would contribute to you so your boss can understand the significance of what you’re asking. Be willing to listen – there may be reasons why your boss chooses not to do what you ask. Focus on your needs and the boss’s – and explore how you can work together in ways which meet those needs.
More than anything, be prepared to learn. This kind of conversation, without exception, yields information. It’s not always information that’s easy to digest. It may be information about you (that you can make requests of your boss, for example, who always wondered why you weren’t more demanding). It may be information about your boss (that s/he knows what you say is right but may not follow through to action). It may be information about the wider organisation. Being better informed opens up choices. They may not be easy choices but they are better informed because you’ve had the conversation.
I wonder, are you ready to give feedback to your boss?
Good Communication that Blocks Learning

Whilst not directly aware of the work of Chris Argyris, I have nonetheless been aware of his work via the work of Roger Schwarz. I was interested recently to come across an article by Chris on the Harvard Business Review blog, entitled Good Communication That Blocks Learning. The quote above is the opening paragraph to Chris’s article, positioning it within the challenging economic times we live in.
Chris’s article took me back to the early days of my career, when Total Quality Management was all the rage and everyone was reading Tom Peters’ In Search of Excellence. This was an era that emphasised making many small improvements based on listening to members of the workforce in order to create a quality product or service and to design out flaws and wastage – at least, this is my memory of Total Quality Management approaching 30 years later.
I don’t remember ever hearing anyone criticise the logic of TQM and still, there are reasons why, all these years later, we still talk about the need to empower – without actually empowering. Argyris’s article scratches the surface to uncover the unconscious behaviours that run counter to our leadership aspirations, preventing us from ‘walking our talk’.
It’s long and it’s also worthwhile – so make yourself a cuppa and close the office door before you read it.
How much do you recognise the behaviours Argyris describes – in yourself? In others?
The not-so-positive “positive sandwich technique”
![]() |
| If you’re using the ‘positive sandwich technique’ to convey negative feedback, you may be treading on thin ice |
In 2007, it was my privilege to participate in an Intensive International Training in Nonviolent Communication with Marshall Rosenberg, author of Nonviolent Communication: a Language of Life. Regular readers will know that this book is a favourite of mine and gets a regular mention on my blog. I went with a friend of mine and we decided to join some of our fellow participants in the dormitory accommodation a short walk from the main building. It was only on day two of the training that I realised that one of our companions in the dorm, surrounded by women old enough to be his mother, was a young man.
The training was a rich experience for me which I continue to treasure. A few people touched me in particular, including the young man in the dorm. As our time together was drawing towards its completion, I asked him (and a few others) if I could have some time with him before we said goodbye. I wanted to express my gratitude and appreciation ahead of our final goodbyes.
Sitting in a quiet corner, I shared, one by one, the things he had done that I most appreciated and how they had contributed to my well-being and enjoyment of the course. It’s been my experience that sharing appreciation in this way can create moments of connection, both with the pleasures of giving and receiving and with each other. On this occasion, though, I noticed that my colleague was becoming increasingly tense – I watched as his body stiffened and asked him what was going on for him.
He told me he was waiting for the real feedback and when I asked him what he meant, he said he was waiting for the negative feedback which must surely follow. I told him there was no negative feedback – I wanted to talk with him precisely because I wanted to share my joy at meeting him and how much I appreciated the time we had spent together. For a moment he seemed to doubt this until he realised that, yes, I really meant what I said. We laughed about the misunderstanding and went on to have the real conversation, celebrating together the times we had enjoyed.
I was reminded of this experience recently when I received notification from Roger Schwarz of the publication of a blog posting he wrote, entitled The “Sandwich Approach” Undermines Your Feedback, published recently by the Harvard Business Review. This approach has been taught to managers over time as a way to soften the blow of giving negative feedback, making it easier to give and easier to receive… or so the theory goes. In practice, as my own experience illustrates, this approach can make people wary of receiving positive feedback because they assume it’s a precursor to some kind of corrective feedback. If you’ve ever tried the “positive sandwich technique” to giving feedback and wondered why it doesn’t work or even tried it and come away believing that it did work, it’s worth reading Roger’s article for a different point of view.
Please let me know know how you get on.
A modern understanding of the brain

Brain science has progressed and continues to progress at such a fast rate in recent years that concepts that were very fashionable just a few years ago are now known to be vastly over-simplified. We also live in a society which favours rational thinking over all else.
Recently, dear friends and members of my mastermind group, Marc and Melanya, have been speaking highly of a book by psychiatrist Iain McGilchrist, called The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. I put in my order on Amazon recently (my, it’s hard to get a hardback copy!) and await its arrival.
At the same time, my friend and coaching colleague Len Williamson highlighted this talk on www.TED.com: The Divided Brain by, you guessed it, Iain McGilchrist. www.TED.com says of this talk:
Psychiatrist Iain McGilchrist describes the real differences between the left and right halves of the human brain. It’s not simply “emotion on the right, reason on the left,” but something far more complex and interesting. A Best of the Web talk from RSA Animate.
Reflections on my 50th birthday
On Saturday, I had a moment of awareness of being in heaven. I was sitting in the You Don’t Bring Me Flowers cafe in Hither Green on my way back from a visit to my hairdresser. It helped that the sun was shining – had shone, indeed, on my walk from Lewisham, through the underpass at Hither Green Station, along Springbank Road and all the way to Hither Green Cemetery and back. It helped that my sandwich was freshly made and accompanied by a (very rare and much savoured) cup of coffee. It helped that I was seated by the window and enjoying the bustle of the cafe. Most of all, it helped that, in this moment, I was present to each and every one of these things – even to the strange juxtaposition of my feelings of sheer bliss with the rather prosaic view out to the rows of cars parked on either side of the street.
Life has not always been bliss, is not always bliss at this time. Regular readers know that the year started with the final illness and death of my uncle and more recently the death of Sir Colin Davis with whom I have regularly performed in recent years as a member of the London Symphony Chorus. There have been other deaths, too. Business has been relatively quiet this year. Initially I was grateful for this period of quiet and even now I know how much it has benefited me to take my foot off the accelerator for a while. I have taken time to assimilate the death of my uncle and to notice how it signals to me the passing, one by one, of my mother’s generation. I have been busy with the house and am thrilled that, having completed the kitchen last year, Gary returned to prepare one of the spare rooms for a second lodger (so that the house can work harder to pay for itself) and to strip and varnish the floors in the hallway.
There are, though, bills to be paid. As the months have gone on at this slow pace I have been feeling increasingly anxious about money, even whilst some part of me feels totally calm. With the anxiety about money come all sorts of thoughts …about the future consequences of this quiet patch, …about whether after almost eleven years of running my own business, I should be looking for a proper job, …about what I should do next to make things happen… about… about… about… It’s not that I have been entirely idle. I have not. I have continued all sorts of activities which, over time, keep me connected to the world and let people know that Learning for Life (Consulting) is open for business. At the same time, in recent weeks, as these different voices within me seek to hold sway, I have found myself neither fully resting nor fully productive.
There are moments when I have been touching into a layer of thinking that is deeper still. I have been surprised, for example, to catch myself fearing that friends and family will not join me in celebrating my 50th birthday. I know these fears are not rational and still, they have, at times, been present – or I, at times, have been present to them. These are fears of being alone and unloved. In my work life I have also had fears – old, old fears of being incompetent and unable to find my way forward. I recognise the tenderness and feelings of vulnerability that comes with these thoughts.
I know from my work with clients that I am not alone with my concerns. Yes, the particular thoughts relate to my own circumstances and still, others also grapple with a plethora of thoughts and with the fears that accompany them. Currently, I am reading Tara Brach’s book Radical Acceptance: Embracing Your Life With The Heart Of a Buddha. Brach begins her book by describing what she calls the “trance of unworthiness”. I have met it in the Board Room. I have met it at every level of the leadership hierarchy. I have met it in my own experience. Brach is not alone in naming our common experience. I think of Timothy Gallwey’s Inner Game of Tennis, of James’ and Jongeward’s Born to Win and even give a nod and a smile to authors whose names and books will come back to me later. I am blessed in having skills and also friends and colleagues who have skills to help me to respond compassionately to my own deepest fears. On Monday, I took time with Steve Matthus, from my mastermind group, to bear witness to those parts of me that are struggling and filled with fear.
Right now, though, on the day of my 50th birthday, I take time to bear witness to everything that is in my life at this time. I bear witness with deep, deep gratitude to friends, family and colleagues for the love and care which nourishes me in my life. I bear witness to the extraordinary privileges that are in my life at this time or have been in my life in the past, including my life and career as a trainer, consultant and coach, including my diverse roles amongst friends and family, including my experience as a lifelong student of what it takes to live life consciously and fully, including my years of singing, including more than half a lifetime of singing as a member of the London Symphony Chorus. And I bear witness to the twists and turns that take me, at times, by surprise and to the fears and doubts as well as to the yearnings and even the needs fulfilled. This is my own imperfect and messy life.
Most of all, I wish myself a very happy 50th birthday.
How criticising in private undermines your team

There’s an old adage that leaders should “praise in public, criticise in private”. It’s so well established that many people accept it without question – except one. Roger Schwarz, writing in March for the Harvard Business Review’s blog, recently wrote a posting entitled How Criticizing in Private Undermines Your Team. I recommend you read it. Why? Two reasons – maybe three, even four…
- If you hold the view that you shouldn’t criticise in public, this article will help you to test your view against your practical experience and maybe even to revise it;
- If you have any ‘persistent offenders’ in your team, this article may give you alternative approaches – and ones that work;
- This article may deepen your understanding of what it means, as a leader, to hold ultimate accountability for the performance of your team;
- If you’re the “leader” of a family (i.e. a parent), this article includes pearls of wisdom for you in this other leadership role.
The fears that keep us working harder than we need to

The art of asking
- One way that springs to mind is to make a “requorder” (“Take this to the post room, will you?” “Get this done by five o’clock, won’t you?”). This is an order or instruction embedded within a request. Beloved of parents, managers and other figures of authority, the desired response is implied in a way which makes it just a bit more difficult to say no than an open honest request;
- Another way is to hold in mind an expectation that is never openly shared (“Any normal manager would have noticed how upset John was feeling” “Who on earth would turn up to such an important meeting without preparing?” “Do you think anyone has told her that trying to go through a 60-slide deck in half an hour was bound to bore the pants off everybody?”);
- Giving feedback is also often a way of making a hidden request (“This document is in a terrible state. I found at least six mistakes on every page – it’s just not up to scratch!”);
- And of course, there’s always the option of giving an order (“You need to complete this document by 5 o’clock at the latest!” “Make sure everyone has the minutes at least two days in advance”).
As ways of getting things done, these tactics vary in their ability to achieve a desired outcome. One of the least successful is to complain around the water-cooler (or at home to our husband or wife): talking about what someone should have done or should do in future rarely leads to a change of behaviour on the part of the person concerned. More successful is the option of giving an order – at least in the short term. Over time, though, the use of a coercive style of leadership can have a corrosive impact on how people feel at work. (If you haven’t already read it, read Daniel Goleman’s article Leadership That Gets Results for an introduction to research in this area.)
- Recognise my emotions around making a request: There are times when the thought of making a request brings up some emotion for me. An example of this is the anger I feel when faced with a car, loud music and a number of teenagers in the car park opposite my house at bed-time. I always start by noticing my emotion and noticing what the emotion is;
- Get clear about what I really want: With the young people in the car park, for example, I may recognise how early I need to get up the next morning and how much I’m longing for sleep. I want to be confident that when I go to bed in a few minutes time I’ll be able to sleep without a background noise of voices and loud music. This is a way of giving myself empathy and tends to soothe the emotion. It’s also important to help me make a request that really does meet my needs;
- Think about different ways of getting what I really want: As long as the only way for me to get to sleep is to get those youngsters out of the car park, it’s difficult for me to make a request rather than a demand: I know people sense the energy of a demand behind the words of a request. Thinking about a variety of ways forward makes it easier for me to make a request. Before I make a request, I take time to think about different options;
- Get curious about what others may have on their minds: The kids in the car park have a reason for being there. Taking time to imagine what those reasons may be helps me to connect with others as and when I do decide to make a request. And because I still remember my mother telling me “I want, doesn’t get”, it helps to remind myself that actually, we all like to contribute to the well-being of others;
- Get clear about what I want to request: Sometimes, the request I end up making is not the one I first thought of. I’ve learnt, for example, to ask the youngsters in the car park how long they’re planning to be there and to explain why that’s important to me. They might feel unhappy to be asked to leave right now, but it’s hard to find a reason not to share their intentions. In the workplace, I may want someone to do something for me but first, I want to know if there’s anything standing in the way. Often my first request is a request for information about the other person (“Is this something you’d be willing to do?” “How does this idea land with you?”);
- Make the request when I can easily accept a yes or a no: Especially when my start-point has been one of emotion, I take time to reach a point when I can hear a yes or a no with equal ease before I make the request. Only at this point do I open the door and walk across the (real or metaphorical) car-park;
- Make a simple action-request: I may say hello and check in. Quite quickly though, I cut to the chase. I make my request and explain why it’s important to me. I make sure my request is specific – describing the action I want someone to take. Then I wait for – and welcome – the answer.




