Category Archives: Developing as a leader

Coaching presuppositions 3: there’s no failure, only feedback

David Whyte, in his book The Heart Aroused, tells the story of a conversation between Thomas Edison and his foreman at the time they were working on ways to produce a filament for a lightbulb. Whyte writes:

“Late in his life, Edison was working on a problem of illumination: how to construct a filament for his brand-new electric light bulb, one that would not burn out, as every material he tried seemed to, in the briefest of instants. He had teams of experimenters working on the problem around the clock for months. Finally, the foreman of the works came to him, cap in hand. ‘Mr. Edison, I am sorry to say we have done a thousand experiments and worked thousands of hours to find this filament and I am afraid to say, it has all been for nothing.’ Edison looked back at the man and said, ‘Nonsense, we know a thousand ways in which it doesn’t work!’”

For the foreman, the numerous experiments had all been for nothing – a failure. For Edison, each experiment had yielded new information, providing valuable feedback on ways that didn’t work and allowing the team to focus their attention on finding new approaches.

As much as any other story, this anecdote illustrates what it means to live from the belief that there’s no failure, only feedback. When we allow ourselves the option to try with no guarantee of success, we are likely to be more open to trying out new approaches and to testing whether or not they work. Over time, we become more flexible and adventurous in our approaches and more open to change. Clearly, these are qualities that many employers yearn for in their staff. What’s more, to be able to live with ease at the thought of trying something and finding it doesn’t have the outcome we intend is to create a platform for sustainable health and high performance.

As coaches – whether professional coaches or leaders in the workplace – understanding the principle that there’s no failure, only feedback allows us to come to coaching with an open curiosity. What outcomes is the person seeking coaching wanting? What actions do they want to take? Which of these actions works and which doesn’t? And what’s next? Rather than put those we coach in the wrong, we are able to explore their experiences with them in ways which invite new insights and open up new avenues of exploration.

Coaching from the belief that there’s no failure, only feedback also implies being open to a variety of outcomes from our coaching. If we do not have a need to be “right”, for example, we can give feedback and make observations without any attachment to a particular response. Sometimes the immediate response to feedback may well be a denial or blank incomprehension – to begin with. Given space to reflect, though, as well as a license for our observation to be true and for the individual still to be OK, the person receiving our feedback may well come back and say, yes, I thought about it and I think you may be onto something.

If you would like to learn more about the presuppositions that underpin coaching or to undertake exercises to test and develop your own presuppositions, keep reading. In the coming days, I’ll be exploring additional presuppositions and offering exercises for you.

Coaching presuppositions 2: We can’t change the others, we can only change ourselves

Be the change you want to see in the world.
Mahatma Gandhi
Oftentimes our culture teaches us to take responsibility for the impact we have on other people and it follows that other people are responsible for the impact they have on us. In the English language this idea is embedded in such everyday phrases as “he made me really angry” or “she made me laugh out loud”. This language reduces a complex process into cause and effect and places our experience at the effect end of the equation.
There are times when those we coach – be they the clients we coach as professional coaches or the staff we coach as leaders in the workplace – hold the belief that their experience is the outcome of the actions of those around them. This belief can limit personal effectiveness dramatically: as long as an individual’s focus is on identifying those things others should do differently, it is unlikely that anything will change in his life. Lives begin to change when we recognise and act on the belief that – no matter what behaviours others demonstrate towards us – we can’t change the others, we can only change ourselves.
The leader as coach often meets a different presupposition in those he coaches. How often do those we lead focus on the words and actions of others when we seek to engage them in a discussion about their own contribution? How often do they look to us to provide a solution to their desires, e.g. for a promotion or payrise? The leader who shares the belief in his responsibility to make his staff happy is likely, over time, to miss many opportunities to help staff members to help themselves.
The coaching leader, on the other hand, knows that his words and actions have a significant impact on those he leads. And still he recognises that the way his words and actions are received is also a function of the individual with whom he is speaking (of their thoughts, beliefs, values etc.). As a coach, he holds the belief that the outcomes his staff members achieve come from their ability to manage themselves, rather from any ability to change others. By coaching from this belief, he invites staff to focus on those areas in which they can make changes and in this way he helps them to help themselves. In the language of leadership, the word “empowerment” is often (maybe over-) used to describe this phenomenon, whilst professional coaches talk of clients as being “at choice” or even “at cause”.
For a leader to be credible in helping his staff to act from this presupposition, he needs to act from the same belief himself. By focusing on those areas in which he can take action and by choosing his actions with care – as opposed to making vocal complaints about those actions he expects of others that haven’t been taken – he leads by example. This is pacesetting at its most powerful and compelling. And herein lies the paradox that sits behind Mahatma Gandhi’s often repeated invitation to be the change we want to see in the world: that it is by the example we set that we have the greatest influence on the behaviours of others.
If you would like to learn more about the presuppositions that underpin coaching or to undertake exercises to test and develop your own presuppositions, keep reading. In the coming days, I’ll be exploring additional presuppositions and offering exercises for you.

Coaching presuppositions 1: We are creative, resourceful and whole

In the field of professional coaching, the coach’s ability to recognise his or her clients as naturally creative, resourceful and whole is a matter of scrutiny. The International Coach Federation, for example, includes this belief as part of its definition of coaching and looks for evidence of this belief when assessing coaches for the different levels of professional credentialling that it offers.

Why does it matter that coaches hold this belief? Coaching aims to help individuals to access their own inner resources in order to achieve the goals they set out for themselves and to overcome the challenges that they face along the way. In other words, coaching aims to support the coaching client in finding his or her own way, rather than to foster a dependency on the coach. Since research demonstrates that our beliefs are self-fulfilling, it helps to adopt a belief about the client that benefits the client and raises the effectiveness of a coaching partnership.

Perhaps there’s another side of the coin – it matters that coaches hold themselves as creative, resourceful and whole. The coach who doubts his own capability may use his time with his clients to generate and gather evidence about his own capability rather than in support of his client’s agenda. In this way, coaching becomes a support to the coach and there is every risk that the client loses out.

How does this presupposition apply when the coach is a line manager, using the coaching style of leadership to support a member of staff? One manifestation of this style illustrates very powerfully the issues involved. When a leader is faced with poor performance, the belief that the leader and the member of staff concerned are both creative, resourceful and whole enables the leader to differentiate between the person concerned and his or her performance. With this distinction in mind, the leader is able to speak openly about performance issues and, for example, to say:

“There are aspects of your performance in this job that aren’t meeting the standards we need. Perhaps this is the right job for you and you need help to develop the skills you need to succeed. Perhaps this just isn’t the right job for you and you need help to find out what is the right job for you – and to move into that job. Either way, in the coming days and weeks I’ll be working with you to support you in finding the right way forward”.

Many times, in interviewing outstanding leaders, I have observed that a statement like this one – rooted in firm beliefs – builds trust and enables the leader and the person concerned to work in coaching partnership to find an effective way forward. Whether the outcome is a change of performance in the job or a change of job, the individual being coached comes out a winner. In this way, the leader is able to execute his responsibilities to the organisation he works for whilst also helping the individual to succeed.

If you would like to learn more about the presuppositions that underpin coaching or to undertake exercises to test and develop your own presuppositions, keep reading. In the coming days, I’ll be exploring additional presuppositions and offering exercises for you.

Developing a coaching mindset

This week, I am putting the final touches to my quarterly newsletter. This goes out on behalf of my business, Learning for Life (Consulting). This month, the main article is aimed at senior leaders who want to develop a coaching culture across their organisation.

Amongst the challenges we face when we set out to create the culture of an organisation are the hidden presuppositions that inform that culture. How do we root them out and examine them when we don’t even know they are there? How do we exchange one set of presuppositions for another? And if we want to develop a coaching mindset, what presuppositions might we want to adopt?

A coaching culture is founded on presuppositions, values and beliefs that support the idea that people want to develop and have the capacity to do so. In a coaching culture, whether our conversation is with ourselves, with those we lead or with others with whom we interact, conversations are informed by a number of presuppositions. These include the following:

  • We are creative, resourceful and whole;
  • We can’t change the others, we can only change ourselves;
  • There’s no failure, only feedback;
  • Every behaviour has a positive intention.

As I write, I wonder how these presuppositions land with my readers and I make a note to write about each one in the course of the coming days.

I also wonder, what presuppositions would you add to this list?

Calling all leaders: what are you reading?

Well, I’ll let you into a little secret. Just recently, I signed up to a course with the Writers Bureau (see http://www.writersbureaucourse.com/). This is a way of exploring my gifts as a writer – something you (as readers of my e-mails, newsletter and blog) have encouraged me to do.

Right (or should I say “write”?) from the beginning, the assignments are focused on the end goal. My second assignment is to choose a publication for which I would like to write an article and to do just that – with the appropriate research and forethought.

So I’m just wondering: as leaders, are you reading about leadership? And what publications are you reading? My list so far is short – the Harvard Business Review, and Sage Publications’ Management Learning and Leadership.

If there are any additional publications you’d suggest I add to the list, please let me know. You can add your comments directly on this blog or send me an e-mail.

Coaching: where’s the evidence?

In the field in which I work – as a coach to leaders – the thirst for evidence (be it of the impact of leadership on business results or of the impact of coaching on leadership effectiveness) is ongoing.

As I think of this I smile. It has been my experience – both as a client of coaching and as a coach to a range of clients – that coaching is an approach whose worth is beyond measure. How many other approaches to leadership development can claim to change lives, even whilst helping people radically to improve their effectiveness in the workplace or indeed to make progress towards unfeasible goals? Not many, I think.

I do not wish to suggest that evidence – of the kind that can be written up in papers and widely shared – is not important. It is. It provides a sound basis for deciding (or not) to invest in coaching and other approaches to leadership development. The more we make decisions to invest on the basis of clear outcomes and having made a sound assessment of the likely effectiveness of the approach we choose, the greater the return on our investment. To do otherwise is to do a disservice to coaching as well as to the businesses for which we are responsible.

I was grateful when a colleague highlighted to me the International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, which is accessible to anyone with an interest in coaching and mentoring at http://www.business.brookes.ac.uk/research/areas/coaching&mentoring/.

Should you find something of value in the Journal or should you know of any alternative sources of information about the effectiveness of coaching, please add a comment here.

Yearning for change in a time of recession

I have been taking some moments today to absorb the comments that have reached me – via e-mail as well as here on my blog – in response to the interview I posted last week with Daniel Pink. What themes are emerging?

Almost without exception, your comments suggest a yearning for change. One reader suggested that it’s time for an approach which is about having ‘enough’ rather than always wanting more. A number of readers point to the opportunity to find ways of moving forward which honour the needs of the many rather than affording excess to the few. Your comments that it’s time to cut back this excess as well as Daniel’s invitation to go back to first principles raise a question for me: how can we meet our needs in ways which restore and preserve the exquisite balance of the planet?

No wonder then, that you view this time of change as a time of opportunity, even whilst wondering whether the opportunity will be taken. Perhaps this is why one reader, responding to the question “Many commentators view the current situation with gloom and despondency. How do you view it?” responded “With optimism, tinged with gloom and despondency”.

One question emerged from your postings which I did not expect to ask: who do we look to for leadership at this time? One correspondent sees the role of our political, corporate and other leaders as “To continue to bluff whilst the situation sorts itself out”. It seems that some of us look to those in leadership positions to take responsibility (even whilst lacking faith in the outcomes of such an approach) whilst others amongst you prefer to do what you can to live your life in integrity with the values you want your leaders to promote.

Reading your comments has evoked memories of Buckminster Fuller, twentieth century inventor and commentator. It’s interesting to me that he asserted, as early as the 1970s, that we were living for the first time in an age in which we have everything we need for all our needs to be met. His prediction was that it would take at least 30 years for us to recognise and act on this fact. It was also Buckminster Fuller who commented widely on the role of integrity. I leave the last word on leadership with him: “We are at the point where the integrity of the individual counts and not what the political leadership or the religious leadership says to do”.

In closing, I extend my warm thanks to Daniel for sharing his thoughts and to all those who have shared their comments by e-mail and on this blog. Please continue to share your thoughts – it seems this thread is one worth keeping alive.

Interviewing Daniel Pink – leadership in a time of global recession

Yesterday, I introduced Daniel Pink, author of A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future. I’m grateful to Daniel for agreeing to share his thoughts on leadership at this time of global recession. And I’m curious – what are your thoughts in response to my questions below? And how do you respond to Daniel’s thoughts? if you feel inspired to respond please post your comments on this blog. Meantime, I send my heartfelt thanks to Daniel for sharing his thoughts across the pond.

Here are the questions I put to Daniel, together with his answers:

Dorothy: Many commentators view the current economic situation with gloom and despondency. How do you view it?

Daniel: Well, what’s happening now in the financial world is scary — especially here in the U.S. I’ve never seen anything quite like it. But just as we had “irrational exuberance” on the way up, we seem to be having “irrational panic” on the way down. Things are not quite as bad as they seem on the surface. Living standards around the world are increasing. We’ve got a mess to clean up, but we can’t let dire straits today mask the broad trend — which is toward greater prosperity, albeit not in a smooth line.

Dorothy: In the words of Ecclesiastes, “to everything there is a season”. What is it time for at this time of economic downturn?

Daniel: It’s probably a time to get back to first principles. It’s tough to get rich quick without cutting corners. Economies are about giving people goods, services, and experiences that make their lives better. Pretty simple, but easily forgotten.

Dorothy: And what do you see as the role of our political, corporate and other leaders at this time?

Daniel: Here in the States, it’s clear that political leaders will be more involved in the economy. We tend to relish the idea of small government, but the fact of the matter is that big government will make a comeback here. And our leaders — both political and corporate — will be navigating a new terrain.

In the Pink – Introducing Daniel Pink

I first heard of Daniel Pink after he spoke to coaches from across the world at a conference of the International Coach Federation about the research that underpins his book A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future.

Reading his book, I experienced his writing as a welcome window on a changing world. I was curious about his thesis that the age of “left brain” dominance is over and I enjoyed his introduction to six “right brain” capabilities that underpin professional success and personal satisfaction in the twenty-first century. His descriptions resonated with me given my work in the field of leadership, including my involvement over the years in research into what makes for an outstanding leader. And even whilst making links between Daniel’s ideas and my own experience of working with leaders, I found Daniel’s ideas stimulating, insightful and fresh. I made contact with Daniel and we have become occasional e-correspondents.

Guess what! Daniel is due to speak in London in December at the International Leadership Summit, Leaders in London. I asked him, “could I include a brief interview with him on my blog?” and he said yes. I’m excited about this and looking forward to posting this brief interview in the coming days.

Oh! And by the way, if you want to hear Daniel speak, you’ll find more information at http://www.leadersinlondon.com/

Talking about leadership

Sometimes, putting an experience from one area of one’s life alongside an interest in another area of one’s life can be thought-provoking and fruitful. This is how I experienced a conversation I had over the weekend with a cherished friend of mine who is also a senior leader in his company.

He was asking me about the Training Journal Daily Digest to which I have been a subscriber since 2002. I love the way the Digest pops into my intray every day and I find it a rich resource. Readers who post requests for help and ideas invariably receive a varied response from a generous readership. Many more readers whose names are never seen benefit from the dialogues to which they are a witness.

How would it be, we wondered, if there were an equivalent resource for leaders? This morning I woke up with a sense of excitement as I think of the rich possibilities this might offer. I also notice a curiosity – I have many questions rattling around in my head. They include:

  • To what extent are people who hold leadership positions interested in the art, craft and science of leadership?
  • Where do people who hold leadership positions look for ideas and opinions about leadership? In particular, what do they read?
  • What appeal might a Daily Digest for leaders hold? And what “rules of engagement” would best serve such a readership?

If you have thoughts about any of these questions, please share them. I’d love to see them here on the blog or in my in-tray at dorothy@learningforlifeconsulting.co.uk.