Tag Archives: London Symphony Chorus

A conductor’s duty is to cross the line

“A conductor’s duty is to cross the line, take risks.
If you want to please the critics, you shouldn’t conduct

Valery Gergiev
Conductor

Saturday morning. It’s been a punishing week and I savour a leisurely start to the day. Six days after I bought my Sunday paper I open the review section of the Observer to read an article I know is there: about Valery Gergiev, Principal Conductor of the London Symphony Orchestra.

The fact that it has taken me so long before reading this article reflects the very reasons I have to be interested to read it. As a member of the London Symphony Chorus I have been balancing my work commitments this week (and somewhat precariously) with the commitments I made to the chorus when I signed up to sing in three concerts in a single week. It all looked so easy – so tidy – on paper! Gergiev has been our conductor for these concerts: two performances of Ravel’s Daphnis and Chloe and one of Berlioz’ Damnation of Faust.

As I read, I recognise so much of journalist Ed Vulliamy’s description of Gergiev the conductor. In our rehearsals Gergiev has paid close attention to particular phrases, passionate about the phrasing or volume or speed. At the same time, other parts of the pieces have barely been touched. It did not go unnoticed, for example, that the time we spent on the final movement of Damnation of Faust gave Kate, member of the chorus, only a little time to acclimatise to singing her solo role.

I am also curious to read Vulliamy’s account of Gergiev’s choice to abandon the baton: “So many batons have flown from Gergiev’s hands into audiences and orchestras over the years that he now conducts with a toothpick, or with an inimitable flutter of the fingers“.

Of course, in response to what we see and how we experience what we see, we all form our own story. Reading Vulliamy’s account it is easy to conclude that the orchestra’s members enjoy the precarious fairground ride which is performing under Gergiev’s leadership. In the chorus, responses vary. Some respond with wry amusement to his “inimitable” (should it be “unfathomable”?) “flutter of the fingers“. Some weave tales of a man for whom the chorus simply does not matter and fall prey to anger or despair. Others are excited by the very qualities Vulliamy describes.

The critics, too, form their own story. I heard of Geoff Brown’s account in the Times of our Damnation from outraged colleagues: “Gergiev’s fingers fluttered busily, but his grasp was intermittent. He ignited Berlioz’s orchestral explosions nicely enough, and graded speeds winningly during Act I. Recklessness elsewhere, though, and a bland Dance of the Sylphs“.

Perhaps my own choices reflect a wider choice to be “at choice”. For it is by choice that I sing with the chorus and it is by choice that I sing under Gergiev’s – toothpick. I want to recognise and own that choice and I don’t want to wallow in self-pity or anger when I yearn for a signal that doesn’t come when our time comes to enter. As an observer of leadership, I also want to approach my experience with curiosity – what does Gergiev’s approach and our various responses tell me about what it means to lead?

Above all, though, it is my choice to enjoy the music. Ravel’s exquisite writing never fails to seduce me and I can hear the flute’s evocative solo even as I write. In the Berlioz the cor anglais was perfectly poised and hauntingly beautiful at the beginning of the fourth act and Joyce DiDonato’s Marguerite left me wide-eyed with admiration.

On the day that became known as 9/11

One of the great perks that comes with singing with the London Symphony Chorus is the opportunity to travel widely, both within the UK and around the world. Over the years the choir has travelled extensively (from Cardiff to Kuala Lumpur, from Newbury to New York) and sung in a variety of stunning and not-so-stunning venues. I remember singing Britten’s War Requiem in the open air in Athens, for example, and singing the first choral concert in the concert hall in Kuala Lumpur’s new Petronas Towers. I also remember singing in Italy in a “converted” sports hall where you could still see the lines of the basketball courts on the floor.

In September 2001 I joined the choir in a modest trip (out one day, back the next) to Ghent in Belgium, where we were due to sing Verdi’s Requiem as part of the Flanders Festival. On the afternoon of 11th September we gathered in the city’s majestic Gothic Cathedral to rehearse with the orchestra and soloists ahead of the evening’s concert.

Verdi’s Requiem is a piece we have often sung and which never loses its depth and grandeur, perhaps because we have been so well trained over the years (by our good friend Sir Colin Davis) to be fully aware of piece’s invocation of death and – worse still – of the fear of death. It is a piece that never fails to move me.

Our rehearsal started well enough as far as I remember. The memory that stands out most begins with the moment when I began to be aware of an unusual level of extra-curricular activity amongst members of the orchestra, who were handing round mobile phones, sharing I-knew-not-what information. By the time we reached our mid-rehearsal break we were all aware that something was happening in the world beyond the cathedrals walls.

I remember the buzz and rumour that broke out as we left the cathedral in search of drinks – and of television screens. I remember watching live images of smoke pouring out from the upper floors of New York’s Twin Towers. It was hard to believe that this was real and not some futuristic horror film.

With the benefit of hindsight, I wonder how these images affected the many Westerners who viewed them and how this compares with the impact of images of disasters from many other parts of the world, especially of what we have come to know as the “third world”. For surely the impact of these images lay, in part, in the way we recognised the Twin Towers as a symbol of our Western lives. These questions were not in my mind at the time, however, as we watched the events unfolding in mute disbelief.

I’d like to say that I vividly remember the concert with the music’s powerful invocation of death. The truth is that my memories are overlaid with the impenetrable veneer of the shock and disbelief we were all experiencing on that evening of 11th September, 2001.

This was the day that became known as 9/11.

Schnittke: beginning a new adventure

Now, it’s not that we’re totally averse to new music in the London Symphony Chorus. Still, mention a composer many of us don’t know and a piece of music we’ve barely even heard of and we can be a little cautious.

Indeed, oftentimes, there’s a familiar pattern to our approach – we start by anticipating the worst, we wrestle with the music in our early rehearsals, finding it hard we declare the music to be absolute rubbish, until finally we put a (more or less) successful performance ‘in the bag’ and suddenly we’re converted.

So, on Wednesday evening, members of the London Symphony Chorus arrived for their first rehearsal of Schnittke’s Nagasaki with a familiar wariness. Half way through our first rehearsal we are already saying the music is not as bad as we had expected. By the end of our second rehearsal we are defying our usual pattern and engaging fully with the music’s haunting sounds and vital rhythms – not to mention the Russian text.

The BBC proms site (at http://www.bbc.co.uk/proms/2009/whatson/2408.shtml#prom52) describes Schnittke’s early, Orff-influenced oratorio, an agonised expression of solidarity with the victims of the second atomic bomb, dropped on the city of Nagasaki the day before Japan’s surrender.

Heavily criticised by the Soviet Composers’ Union, it only received its 1959 broadcast premiere (on Moscow World Service Radio) after Shostakovich’s recommendation, and was not publicly performed until 2006.

As we prepare to perform this piece, I feel privileged to be able to join the Chorus for its belated UK premiere.

Do come and join us.

Honouring Michael Jackson

Sometimes, after a concert, I take a little time before going to bed – to read, to catch the day’s news, above all, to settle. On Thursday I was both tired and elated after the evening’s performance (not to mention a little bemused by the woman on the bus who told me – and our fellow passengers – that I have “the most enormous arse” when I sat next to her and caused her to have to sit up and confine herself to just one seat). I went straight to bed.

This is not to say I did not savour the evening’s music. The Chorus had a minor role to play so that, whilst waiting to sing, we got to savour the rich textures of Debussy and Ravel and to marvel at the young pianist, Yuja Wang, as she played Ravel’s Piano Concerto in G with both great precision and a kind of daring and abandon. Our own rendition when it came – of Villa Lobos’ Choros No 10 – matched her daring and abandon, though perhaps not her precision.

Waking on Friday morning to the news of Michael Jackson’s death, my pleasure in the evening’s concert was replaced by a sense of shock – the disbelief that often comes with the news, whether expected or not, that someone has died. Putting my shock aside I got on with my schedule of appointments and, in turn, with the weekend’s activities.

Today I have time to pause. The newspapers are full of reflections on Jackson’s universal appeal – his genius, even – as a musician as well as on so many signs that his life as a child-star-become-adult-celebrity was neither easy nor healthy. I have little to say that has not been – will not be – said in the coming days and weeks. Still, I want to honour a man whose music has had such a profound impact on generations of people and all around the world. As I write, I play Jackson’s joyful rendition of Don’t Stop ‘Til You get Enough on YouTube. The music, the dance, the sheer joie de vivre – as one critic put it, his jouissance: this is what Jackson gave us.

May he rest in peace.

Celebrating London in the evening sunshine

London has been sparkling in the sunshine. As I walked down Bishopsgate yesterday I was struck by the deep blue of the late afternoon sky. Beneath it, the buildings had a fresh appeal. It was like looking at an old friend or lover and seeing beauty you had never noticed before or long since forgotten.

Tower 42, the old NatWest Tower, sometimes looks a little weary to me. Not yesterday. The glass was gleaming in the sunshine. Its windows, and the windows of the buildings around it, reflected both the City’s traditional architecture and the cranes at work creating a new generation of buildings. A living art work.

Michael Tilson Thomas (aka MTT) was also sparkling yesterday. Reflecting on our rehearsal as I walked away, I wondered if he’d noticed that the sopranos were lost – almost to a woman – early in the evening’s last run-through of Villa Lobos’ Chorus Number 10. Still adjusting to the speed at which he took this piece, we were struggling to watch him whilst also following the music. If he did notice, he handled it with consummate grace, recognising the challenge of staying on track and urging us to prioritise maintaining the rhythm of the music over a perfect and precise rendition of the notes.

As I write, I think of my coaching clients. Isn’t that a great analogy for life? For what is it to sing each perfect note of life in tune, if in the end our life has lost its rhythm?

In memoriam

Today I sang at the memorial service of Richard Hickox, who was Music Director of the London Symphony Chorus when I joined in 1986 and who died in November last year. It was a beautiful service which is probably still echoing around St. Paul’s Cathedral as I write.

And though I have the opportunity to write about this service, I notice that – at least for now – my need is to be still and present to all the emotions that are with me at this time. Sometimes, it’s important to be truly present to the experience rather than to ‘observe’ it through the act of writing.

As one of my former LSC colleagues said to me after the service “I’m all mashed up and turned inside out”.

Freecycling into my local community

Months after Sarah Illingworth first mentoned to me, in passing, something she called Freecycle, I took a moment this morning to investigate.

Freecycle is a global recycling project, which aims to provide the means for people to find new homes for objects which are still useful – but not to them. Of course, it also provides objects to people to whom they are useful. As its name suggests, the primary rule is that the objects are available for free.

I take just a few minutes to sign up and, using the format provided to create clear postings, to make six ‘offers’ – from some rather neglected houseplants to the video player which still works and which I no longer use. I don’t know if these objects will find homes, though I do hope they will.

It’s amazing what we get from belonging to communities of various kinds. Sarah’s passing comment came to me as we enjoyed our shared community: the London Symphony Chorus. As I write, I wonder what new relationship I will develop with the community in which I live as a result of joining Freecycle.

When feedback delights

Feedback, with its power to nourish or to test, is a wonderful thing. Sometimes, it just takes you by joyful surprise.

Yesterday, at my regular rehearsal with the London Symphony Chorus, I was blessed with a double whammy of the nourishing variety. Midway through our first rehearsal of Berlioz’ Te Deum, Lorne leant over from the tenors to tell me how fabulous my singing was. Did I lap that feedback up? You bet I did! (And was I aware that, for some reason, I was singing from the very depths of my heart and soul? Yes, that, too).

I was also delighted when Elizabeth, talking to me about wrinkles and face-creams, guessed my age at anywhere between 35 and 41. Let me tell you I love my wrinkles! I wouldn’t lose a single one of them! And still, as I approach my 46th birthday, I’m quite content to know that I look (to some eyes, at least) a little younger than I am.

This is not the first time of late that I have enjoyed a comment about my age. Only a week ago a colleague of my niece asked me if we are sisters. I told him no and thanked him for his comment. This took him aback I think – it was not intended as a compliment, he said. He was quite sincere. I only regret I didn’t think to say that yes, it was precisely because I knew his question was sincere that I enjoyed it so much.

Putting modesty to rest

Sunday. After a packed week of rehearsals (packed around work, that is) members of the London Symphony Chorus join the London Symphony Orchestra and a dazzling line up of soloists (Christine Brewer, Karen Cargill, Stuart Neill and John Relyea) to perform Verdi’s Requiem under the baton of Sir Colin Davis.

The performance is dedicated to the memory of Richard Hickox following his oh so untimely death last November and his family are gathered in the stalls. I was not alone in experiencing moments of deep emotion during rehearsals, wishing for Richard that he does indeed enjoy safe passage to whatever lies ahead and mourning the loss of such a dedicated and inspiring musician. Now though, is not the time to miss an entry to be present to such emotions.

Perhaps it is because of the special significance of this dedication or maybe it’s because Sir Colin has put us through our paces – there will be no complacency here – that our performance blazes a trail through Verdi’s exquisite writing. From the hushed cello entry and the muted Requiem of the chorus at the beginning of the piece, through the fiery Dies Irae to the closing fugue and call to libera me it seems to me that the orchestra, chorus and soloists catch every nuance, doing justice to this magnificent work and to Richard as we bid him farewell.

Two days later, with two more performances to look forward to, I find myself reflecting on my own performance. The Requiem is a demanding sing, requiring stamina and the ability both to give life and volume to many fortissimo passages and still to have the vocal control for the quieter passages. There are some that require the kind of quiet singing at the top of one’s range that can terrify the amateur singer – all the more so when you find yourself in the front row of the chorus singing into the left ear of one of the Orchestra’s fine professional musicians.

I smile as I celebrate my own performance and recognise that, for the time being at least and notwithstanding my lingering cold, I am singing well. Of course I gave my all in the Dies Irae – for high volume and dramatic singing are my forte. And still I managed to sustain my voice and to land quietly and truly on some of the high, quiet phrases. I ponder, wondering what is giving me this ease and joy in my singing.

And I feel so grateful that I have reached a stage in my life when I am able to celebrate in this way, putting modesty to rest and allowing myself to acknowledge fully everything that I bring. Surely this alone contributed to a ‘personal best’ on Sunday.

Richard, I hope you were listening.

Richard Hickox. May he rest in peace.

When my father died, in August 2006, I was tasked by my mother to phone a list of friends and family to break the news. My father did not die young – he was 95 – and still, I was overcome by tears in my first calls. I quickly adjusted my approach – a quick “Hello. How are you?” was somehow enough for me to be able to break the news without tears. Without exception those people I phoned responded by telling a story from their treasure chest of experiences and I gained many new perspectives on the man who was my father.

This evening, I am shocked by the news which has just reached me of the death of Richard Hickox on Sunday, 23rd November, 2008. When I joined the London Symphony Chorus in 1986 Richard was still, in the eyes of some, the new kid on the block as the chorus’ Music Director. Since that time, no year has passed without us raising our voices in response to Richard’s baton. As the news sinks in I, too, touch base with the treasure chest of my experiences.

They were not always pleasant! I remember a time when Richard, dissatisfied in rehearsal with the performance of the semi chorus had us, one by one, sing the pianissimo top G he wanted in front of our fellow singers. Standing at one end of the row I could feel a rising tension as I waited my turn. I was overcome with relief when one of my fellow sopranos told him, “Richard, I’m feeling too nervous right now to attempt this note”. It seemed to me that Richard came to his senses in this moment. I didn’t have to sing the note.

Even my most recent experience of singing with Richard was not ideal. A combination of a late change to our rehearsal schedule and a prior commitment meant that I missed two important rehearsals and had just one hour’s tutti rehearsal before our recent performance of Vaughan William’s Dona Nobis Pacem. Seated as I was in the middle of the front row I knew that, no matter how confident I felt, Richard would be seeking out my eyes, for he seemed to draw reassurance from the full attention of the long-standing members of the chorus – the “old timers”. I gave him my eyes – though not always the right notes.

To grieve is also to celebrate and as I write I am surveying the vast repertoire of music I performed with Richard and thinking of the rich fullness of my experience. I feel a great sense of loss – surely his death came too soon! I especially feel for Pamela, his wife, and for his three children. And I feel the depth of gratitude which comes with so many memories of so much music making. I feel especially grateful to have given him my eyes one last time. May he rest in peace.